1/2-ton Pickup Shootout: 5 trucks, 5 days, 1 winner

[imagebrowser id=376]

We take the most popular 2015 4×4 Crew Cab 4x4s and put them to an old-fashioned, hood-to-hood comparison; Ford and GM a close fight, Ram and Toyota not so much 

(Photos by Bruce W. Smith & Evan Sears/Cars.Com)

As anyone who has a competitive spirit knows, talk is cheap. It’s how the results come out when the contest is over that matters.

There’s a lot of talk about who has the best 1/2-ton pickup. Ford says the F150. Chevy claims it’s the Silverado. Toyota touts the Tundra. Ram Truck points to the Ram 1500. GMC praises the Sierra.

The competitors at the ready: Ford, Ram, GMC, Chevrolet and Toyota crew cab 4×4 V8s.The competitors at the ready: Ford, Ram, GMC, Chevrolet and Toyota crew cab 4×4 V8s.

So exactly how do the most popular 2015 half-tons around jobsites –  the  four-door 4x4s – really stack up against each other?

We partnered with Cars.Com/Pickuptrucks.Com’s test staff on an old-fashioned shootout to find out. The test criteria:

  • The tests would be both qualitative and quantitative with points awarded based on both track testing and open highway performance.
  • The trucks would tested unladen, towing Logan horse trailers and carrying a load in the bed.
  • The competitor’s vehicles had to cost less than $55,000.
  • They had to have a V-8, and be a four-door with four-wheel-drive. The rest was left up to each manufacture’s choosing as to trim and options.

CRUNCHING NUMBERS

The number-crunching involved track testing with data gathered via VBOX Racelogic data loggers, highway fuel economy and acceleration testing on the 6-percent grade of highway climbing out of Davis Dam (AZ), and votes cast by five automotive writers, including myself, with decades of experience testing pickups.

Fuel economy. Trucks were fueled at the end of every test cycle at the same pump by the same person after mileage was logged.Fuel economy. Trucks were fueled at the end of every test cycle at the same pump by the same person after mileage was logged.

My fellow judges for this shootout: Cars.com Road Test Editor Joe Bruzek; MrTruck.com‘s Kent Sundling; PickupTrucks.com Editor Mark Williams; and freelance automotive journalist David Boldt,

Scoring was simple: The winner of each of the 11 test categories received 100 points, with the remaining competitors receiving their calculated percentage.

Those empirical categories included: acceleration (loaded/unloaded); braking (loaded/unloaded): fuel economy (empty/towing); payload capacity; towing capacity and other vehicle capability comparisons.

The remainder of the point totals (about 35 percent) consisted of the judges scoring the trucks in six different areas related to ride, handling, ergonomics and other driving factors.

The total scores were tallied after five days of evaluations that included each judge driving hundreds of miles of driving each truck (with and without Logan horse trailers loaded to 6,700 pounds in-tow), making multiple passes with each truck down the dragstrip, and taking a pages of notes.

EVALUATING THE RESULTS

When the tire smoke cleared a winner appeared by the closest of margins: Chevrolet’s 2015 Silverado 1500 Crew Cab 4×4 LTZ 6.2L.

Chevrolet’s Silverado 1500 was followed closely in total points by GMC’s 6.2L 1500 SLT, with Ford’s 5.0L XLT F-150 a close third. Ram Trucks’ 1500 Laramie Longhorn and Toyota’s Tundra TRDPro, both running 5.7L V8s, finished 4th and 5th respectively.

1_2TonV8 axletranschartAxle ratios varied considerably between the five competitors while transmission were either 8-speeds or six.

1_2tonV8brakinggraphDifferences in emergency braking tests from 60mph, both loaded and unloaded, were within a truck length across all five pickups. Tires and vehicle weight made a noticeable difference.

1_2TonV8EPAmpgchartEPA fuel economy numbers for the field of V8s were identical for all except the Tundra, which had the oldest engine technology.

1_2tonV8MPGchartReal-world mpg test numbers varied considerably, both from EPA numbers and between truck brands. GM’s 6.2L V8s showed strong in unladen highway mileage, while Ford’s 5.) looked best when towing.

1_2TonV8MSRPpriceWe placed a $55,000 ceiling on the test vehicles. The trucks we received varied across the board with the $45,000 Tundra being the least expensive and the $54,800 Ram the most.

1_2TonV8quatermilespeedSpeeds through the ¼-mile traps were impressive for some of our 7,000-pound 4x4s. The 6.2L Silverado and Sierra were the clear winners in both loaded and ulnloaded testing by nearly 4mph ahead of their closest rival, the 5.0L F150.

1_2TonV8sQmiletimesProof a lower axle ratio and lighter truck (Sierra) is faster than a similar model (Silverado) with taller highway gearing. Sierra’s biggest problem was hooking up the rear tires off the line.

1_2TonV8sweightpayloadPayload (and trailer towing capacity) are where the work part meets the road. That’s where the Sierra with the “max tow package” and aluminum-body F150 lead the way. F150 was by far the lightest curb weight of the ½-ton pickups tested.

1_TonV8hptorquechartAs the old racer’s saying goes, “There’s no replacement for displacement.” The naturally-aspirated V8 power honors go to the 6.2L GMs with 420hp and 460 lbs.-ft. torque.

1_TonV80-60chartThe fastest accelerating truck honors go to the GMC Sierra by less than the width of a bumper. Ford’s 5.0L held its own against the 5.7L Hemi, while Toyota’s 5.7L was left a tick or two behind.

My own subjective evaluation placed the softer-riding and higher-tech 2015 F-150 and plusher Ram Laramie Longhorn ahead of the GMC Sierra 1500.

I felt the Sierra’s heavy-duty towing option made the truck ride far too harsh when it wasn’t burdened with a payload in the bed or with a trailer on the hitch. And, from an interior perspective, it just didn’t stack up against the Silverado, XLT or Longhorn.

But that’s why votes from multiple judges, along with hard track data, helps bring multiple vehicle comparisons to a general consensus.

TRUCK BY TRUCK

Here’s a synopsis of how each of the 2015 ½-ton pickups faired from our five-way 4×4 shootout:

1st: Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Z71 LTZ 6.2-liter (1,554 points)

And the winner is … Chevy Silverado 1500 Z71. The combination of GMs 6.2L V8 power, plush interior, and a quiet, stable ride drove this Crew Cab 4×4 to the top of the 2015 ½-Ton Shootout.And the winner is … Chevy Silverado 1500 Z71. The combination of GMs 6.2L V8 power, plush interior, and a quiet, stable ride drove this Crew Cab 4×4 to the top of the 2015 ½-Ton Shootout.

“Although the Silverado did not collect the most points in our 11 empirical tests (the GMC won by just three points), the $54,310 Chevy won five tests outright and placed second in four others,” says Mark Williams who led the comparison testing.

As dominating as that might sound, the score sheets show it was the judges’ scoring that separated the Silverado 1500 from its competitors: It placed either first or second with four of the five judges, including yours truly.

The single area where the Chevy lost quantitative points was the payload category, because this vehicle was not equipped with GM’s NHT max-tow package as the Sierra 1500 was.

I, like the other judges, felt the Silverado was the best all-around player, doing everything asked of it with ease. And none of the competitors were as quiet on the road or responsive from a power perspective.

“Of all the trucks, the Silverado has the best ride and most planted feel, especially towing the trailers we have on the hitch,” says my test notes. “Silverado is remarkably stable when towing despite us not using a WD hitch; no trailer movement. Quietest interior of the bunch”

“Engine isn’t as strong off line as Tundra, but it only takes a second or two before the big block comes to life. Wonderful power at speeds above 50mph! The new 8spd automatic could have closer ratio in lower gears. Leather quality good (not to RAM’s level); best ergonomics of the group.”

The truck’s 6.2L V8 is magical in how strong it pulls and how quickly the 8-speed automatic slams up through the gears when the foot is on the floor during the Davis Dam “hillclimb” and on the dragstrip.

In the end the Silverado nipped its GMC stablemate by just 11 points and bested the all-new Ford F-150 by 45 in our test group’s finally tally.

2nd: GMC Sierra 1500 SLT 6.2-liter (1,543 points)

Mechanically there was little difference between the GMC Sierra 1500 in this test compared to the Chevy Silverado 1500. But what differences there were made all the difference in this closely contested comparison.

Of the 11 empirical tests we performed for this comparison, either the Chevy or the GMC won nine. The GMC Sierra 1500 included the NHT max-tow package, which gave the truck a stronger, bigger ring-and-pinion with a lower (3,42) ratio, stiffer suspension and different tires.

GMC’s Sierra 1500, with the 420hp 6.2L V8, took top honors in payload, towing and track performance numbers thanks to the NHT max-tow package that included 3.42 axle ratio. Its stiffer ride is the only thing that kept it from taking the top spot from the Silverado.GMC’s Sierra 1500, with the 420hp 6.2L V8, took top honors in payload, towing and track performance numbers thanks to the NHT max-tow package that included 3.42 axle ratio. Its stiffer ride is the only thing that kept it from taking the top spot from the Silverado.

“Almost identical in quietness as the Silverado,” I note in my test logbook, “which is expected as both are same design: 66 dBa @65 mph. Same engine, steering, braking and trans impressions as the Chevy: really strong engine. Hard brakes and neutral steering. The GMC rides considerably rougher and has harshness the Silverado doesn’t—I attribute the stiffer ride to the higher payload package. Rides like an HD, not a ½-ton.”

The GMC’s lower axle ratio was just enough to give it a little more launching power on the track, and the NHT springs a little less suspension compliance on the road. (The stiffer unladen ride is where the GMC lost valuable points on my scoresheet.)

With the highest GVWR of the lot, quicker acceleration, and other performance factors in its favor, the $54,655 Sierra finished in first place just three points ahead of Chevy in the track performance tests. It’s weakest showing: loaded 60mph-0 braking.

In our qualitative judging, with the exception of one of our judges, the GMC Sierra 1500 did not garner enough points from our experts to finish better than fourth.

3rd: Ford F-150 XLT 5.0-liter (1,509 points)

The new Ford F-150, with the revamped 5.0L V8, is an impressive combination of engineering and smart integration, all wrapped in an aluminum shell. The result is probably the most confident feeling and strongest road cruiser of our test.

“The way the power gets to the wheels and the steering wheel connects to the suspension is simply impressive,” says Williams.

Ford sent a “pre-production” 5.0L F-150 XLT with a cloth interior to do battle against leather-clad GMs and Ram. It scored first place in the six qualitative categories, showing how well Ford has done on taking the truck’s power, technology and interior design to the next level.Ford sent a “pre-production” 5.0L F-150 XLT with a cloth interior to do battle against leather-clad GMs and Ram. It scored first place in the six qualitative categories, showing how well Ford has done on taking the truck’s power, technology and interior design to the next level.

From my logbook: “67 dba @65mph makes it the second quietest interior of the five trucks I drove…this truck has very good downhill braking and nice integrated brake controller. You can tell Ford is targeting towing buyers. The revamped 5.0L has throaty, but not overly loud exhaust note when you roll into the throttle. It’s a good performer for being the smallest of this bunch. Love it.”

A point of note: All the F-150s available for testing were technically “pre-production,” meaning Ford could only give us what was available, which is why we got a V8 XLT with “EcoBoost” badging on the side of the truck.

Still, this test truck won two of our tests outright and finished second in two more: A strong showing for the smallest V8 in the group.

In addition, the judging group scored the F-150 in first place in the six qualitative categories, showing how well Ford has done on taking the truck’s technology and interior design to the next level.

And it could have done better. The consensus from the judges is the XLT interior trim itself wasn’t nearly as plush or as nicely appointed as those it competed against.

 “Cloth seats disappointing when Ford could have sent a truck with leather interior and nicer trim and still been under the $55K cutoff,” I note in the logbook. If Ford would have sent a Lariat or King Ranch model, well, things may have settled out differently.

Still, the $47,845 F150 XLT was judged as being a really good value, being the second least expensive truck of the five and missing a second by a mere 34 points. (I had scored the F150 as my second place finisher.)

4th: Ram 1500 Laramie Longhorn 5.7-liter (1,422 points)

It’s comparison tests such as this that shine a bright light on technology that’s no longer leading the fast-moving full-size pickup pack. Two years ago the F-150 and Ram 1500 would have been bumper-to-bumper to the finish line. Today, not so much.

The Longhorn edition is one of the nicest interiors, if not the nicest, of the five trucks. And it received high marks from everyone for that. But the ride of the air suspension and general performance of the 5.7L Hemi just didn’t stand up well against the 6.2L GMs.

Ram Trucks’ 1500 Laramie Longhorn caught testers’ eyes for its fine interior, but it wasn’t enough to move the Crew Cab ahead of its GM or Ford competitors in overall scoring. Lack of payload and towing capacity hurt the truck the most.Ram Trucks’ 1500 Laramie Longhorn caught testers’ eyes for its fine interior, but it wasn’t enough to move the Crew Cab ahead of its GM or Ford competitors in overall scoring. Lack of payload and towing capacity hurt the truck the most.

“Ram Hemi sounds great under hard throttle and feels like it has strong low- to mid-range pull. Runs out of torque faster than the 6.2L GMs. But most impressive is the eight-speed automatic; its shifts are close-ratio and keep the rpm right in the heart of the power curve when you are hard on throttle. Best interior of the lot. Makes you feel like a rich dude driving the truck,” say my logbook notes.

Unfortunately for Ram it didn’t stack up against the GMs or Ford in payload, towing , braking or fuel economy, losing valuable scoring points in those areas.

Although the Ram 1500 Hemi didn’t win a single category, it scored well almost everywhere with the exception of braking and fuel economy, where it lost the largest percentage of points to the F-150.

At $54,820, the Ram did the best job of packing in available options to stay under our $55,000 ceiling, but the Longhorn package just wasn’t enough to make up for its perceived weaknesses in the other categories.

5th: Toyota Tundra TRD Pro 5.7-liter (1,295 points)

Here’s the one truck where I felt the manufacturer didn’t put their best foot forward. Toyota’s Tundra TRD Pro is the newest trim package for 2015, and at $45,045 it was the least expensive player in our competition.

But I couldn’t figure out why Toyota would put a truck with a dedicated off-road package (big tires and wheels, softer suspension and durability-first interior) in a competition where towing, load capacity, and a lot of highway driving and track testing were at the forefront. But they did, and it made a good truck look bad.

Right truck. Wrong place. Toyota’s Tundra TRD Pro model, setup for off-road adventure, was simply no match competing against 1/2-ton 4×4 crew cabs tuned for towing, comfort and connectivity.Right truck. Wrong place. Toyota’s Tundra TRD Pro model, setup for off-road adventure, was simply no match competing against 1/2-ton 4×4 crew cabs tuned for towing, comfort and connectivity.

Good low-end but the truck’s heaviness gets in the way of the power when you reach highway speeds,” says my logbook. “Minor fore/aft surging while towing trailer (a direct result of no weight-distributing hitch being used during these towing tests),” reads my test notes.

“Truck sounds awesome with the TRD exhaust. Better than any Hemi. But drone is annoying on long drives. Loudest inside and out of the five trucks: 75 dba @65 mph (loud). Overly sensitive to drive: light steering, brakes touchy.”

Toyota’s Tundra has the most legroom in the ½-ton class with head-turning exterior looks that appeal to the desert-running off-road crowd.

Painted orange and sitting a couple inches taller than the competitors on off-road tires wrapped around faux bead-lock wheels, it’s the showoff of the five crew cab 1/2-ton 4x4s tested.

But despite its machismo the 2015 Tundra TRD Pro is out of its league competing against 1/2-ton 4×4 crew cabs tuned for towing, comfort and connectivity.

Big Muscle vs Little Muscle:  6.2L GM VS 3.5L Ford

During the same outing we put comparable 2wd V-6 pickups through the same tests. Just for fun we took the best performing track star of the V8s, the GM 6.2L, and put its numbers against the best performing V-6, the Ford F150 3.5L Ecoboost, in a fun Ford-verses-Chevy ½-ton numbers comparison.

Although the numbers here are not “apples-to-apples,” they do shed light on where pickup engine technology is today.

The old racer’s adage, “There’s no replacement for displacement” is becoming just that: an old adage.

Chevrolet 1500 6.2L GM 6.2L EcoTec3 V8GM 6.2L EcoTec3 V8
  • Axle Ratio: 3.23
  • Trans: 8spd
  • Curb weight: 5,620 lbs.
  • 0-60: 5.92
sec.
  • 0-60 loaded: 7.09 (1,240 lbs)
  • ¼-mile: 14.34
sec.
  • ¼-mile loaded 15.36 sec. (1,240 lbs)
  • MPG empty:19.8
  • MPG towing: 10.2 (6,700 lbs)
  • Braking 60-0: 133.7 ft.
  • Braking loaded 60-0: 132.2 ft. (1,240 lbs)
  • Davis Dam hillclimb/towing: 19.92 (6,700 lbs)

 

Ford F150 3.5L EcoBoost Ford 3.5L EcoBoost V6Ford 3.5L EcoBoost V6
  • Axle ratio: 3.55
  • Trans: 6spd
  • Curb weight: 5,560 lbs.
  • 0-60: 6.22
sec.
  • 0-60 loaded: 7.02 sec. (1,080 lbs.)
  • ¼-mile: 14.84
sec.
  • ¼-mile loaded: 15.50 sec. (1,080 lbs.)
  • MPG empty: 18.5
  • MPG towing: 11.1 (4,200 lbs)
  • Braking 60-0: 133.6 ft.
  • Braking loaded 60-0: 135.3 ft. (1,080 lbs.)
  • Davis Dam hillclimb/towing: 20.76 sec. (6,700 lbs)